Subscribe to email alerts
Governance, conduct and culture
Organisational change and transformation
Public sector advisory
Forensic accounting and disputes
Forensic technology, cyber and eDiscovery
Fraud, corruption and investigations
Real estate funds management
Real estate investment
Private equity and special situations investment
Holder of an AFSL
Real estate advisory
Project sales and management
Turnaround and restructuring
Independent business reviews
Receiverships, administrations and liquidations
“Helping you know whether it is worth the fight.”
Andrew believes that understanding what’s at stake is the key to resolving any dispute.
For over 25 years, he has assisted Australian and international clients involved in complex commercial disputes – working ‘behind-the-scenes’ with the legal team preparing or reviewing claims and determining case strategy or acting as an independent expert, preparing reports and giving evidence in courts and before tribunals.
In either role, Andrew’s thorough analysis and clear communication helps clients and their opponents come to grips with the critical financial aspects of their disputes. This maximises the likelihood of early and successful resolution, allowing clients to get back to what really matters to them.
Outside the office, Andrew and his family have for decades supported NGOs in countries like Kazakhstan, Cambodia and the Philippines to address grassroots and transnational poverty and injustice.
Chartered AccountantValuation of shares, businesses and assetsPreparation of expert reports and provision of expert evidenceCourt-appointed referee and party-appointed expert determinator.
Bachelor of Commerce (Hons)Bachelor of Laws (Hons)Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance and InvestmentAccredited Business Valuation Specialist.
Andrew Ross, Partner in our Forensic group spoke with INTHEBLACK recently about the changing role of forensic accountants and expert witnesses in modern business.
Andrew Ross considers some of the issues that can occur throughout the life of a matter that can result in joint conferences of experts not always resulting in the efficient resolution of disputes.